Wednesday, February 25, 2009

IS POETRY DEAD? And will anyone come to the funeral?

There is serious discussion in the academic community about whether it makes sense to continue to teach poetry to high school English students: does it teach skills other genres do not? Does it connect to the rest of our lives enough to justify it? Is there a value to enigma? I myself, your English teacher, have shifting opinions on this subject, and am very interested in arguments on either side of this question.

You have been reading a series of love poems over the last week, and will continue to examine them for a few more days. Consider your experience with these poems along with all your experiences with poetry.

THEN, make your argument: is poetry worth teaching in a high school English classroom?

Please consider, in your argument, the following:
  • How you, your peers, and/or your teachers approach poetry
  • The role poetry plays in every day life
  • How poetry differs from prose, and whether that difference matters
  • Experiences, good or bad, that you have had when reading or interpreting poetry
  • Specific poems that you remember that contributed to those experiences

Please respond to the most interesting argument that you read on this blog, and please practice good grammar.

Also, you must consider the two texts below as part of your argument:

"Poets are expected to make sense of life. If they find life today in fragments, they must not leave it that way." -- Jayanta Mahapatra

The Questions Poems Ask

Lawrence Raab

Watching a couple of crows
playing around in the woods, swooping
in low after each other, I wonder
if they ever slam into the trees.

There's an answer here, unlike
most questions in poems,
which are left up in the air.
Was it a vision or a waking dream?

You decide, says the poet.
You do some of this work,
but think carefully.
Some people want to believe

poetry is anything
they happen to feel. That way
they're never wrong. Others yearn
for the difficult:

insoluble problems, secret codes
not meant to be broken.
Nobody, they've discovered,
ever means what he says.

But rarely does a crow
hit a tree, though other, clumsier birds
bang into them all the time, and we say
these birds have not adapted well

to the forest environment.
Frequently stunned, they become
easy prey for the wily fox,
who's learned how to listen

for that snapping of branches
and collapsing of wings,
who knows where to go
and what to do when he gets there.

Monday, February 16, 2009

Grammar Matters? AP ENGLISH 3rd period

This article was submitted by Stephanie Hernandez (and now she gets serious extra credit).

Read the following article about grammar. Then respond to my questions to you, which you'll find at the end of the article. You'll have to read the article first, though.

DALLAS -- A cup of regualar coffee sounds like the perfect way to start your day. Wouldn’t some cheep gas be nice? But if you park your car, you’ve been warned: No in-and-out priviliges. These mangled spellings — on real-life signs around the Dallas-Fort Worth area — underline the obvious: Spelling isn’t always high on our list. And our grammar ain’t that good, to.

It’s enough to make your English teacher cringe — and drive others to break the law. Last month, two men were sentenced to probation and banned from national parks for a year after getting busted for fixing errors on a sign in Grand Canyon National Park. The men travel the country correcting signs as part of the Typo Eradication Advancement League. And, yeah, they might have crossed the line by messing with a historical sign in a national park, but they’ve got a point.

Across the country, our land is littered with signs, posters, ads, menus — you name it — that are riddled with spelling and grammatical errors. In some cases, human spell-checkers battle these boo-boos by fixing the errors on their own. Others snap pictures and trash the typos on their blogs.

GRAMMAR ON A DOWNWARD SPIRAL?
Grammarians say these are bad signs of the times — our language is on a downward spiral. Correct spelling and proper grammar matter and help us understand each other, said Martha Brockenbrough, who founded the Society for the Promotion of Good Grammar. “There are rules for how you play football and there are rules for how you drive,” she said. “Standards of football keep things interesting, fair and fun. I think they do the same for language.”

Sign offenders abound around Dallas-Fort Worth. Hungry and in a hurry? A fast-food restaurant sign showcased a deal for "10 pieses of chicken." A Knox-Henderson restaurant is “Now Open for LUNCH FRIDAY’S” (drop the apostrophe, guys). Want a bargain? You can get it at the Bargin City Bazaar in Oak Cliff. How about this twisted apology at a toy store: “We apologise for the inconveinance.” A mural on the side of a building at the Preston Royal shopping center shows what appears to be a movie theater with a sign that says: “ Premier Tonight.”

Misspelled words and names slip into newspapers and television news graphics every day. An Associated Press story described Joe Lieberman as the 2000 Democratic vice presidential ... well, let’s just say that it was quickly changed to “pick.”

Different groups have different ways of handling the more permanent typos and misspellings, without breaking the law. Brockenbrough’s Society for the Promotion of Good Grammar takes the polite route, sending out friendly letters to offenders encouraging them to make corrections. “It’s not about shame and humiliation,” said Brockenbrough of Seattle, who launched National Grammar Day this year.

TEXTING CONTRIBUTES TO DOWNFALL OF GRAMMAR?
Some also say that students’ text messaging and Twittering — which encourage short notes and abbreviations and spelling-be-damned — are seeping into formal writing. Students are writing informally now more than ever, said Diana Grumbles, director of the First-Year Writing Program at Southern Methodist University. Some of her students don’t capitalize or use punctuation when they send her a quick e-mail. Some will submit in-class writing assignments with symbols. “I always just circle these things and tell them at the end of the paper that they have to write the words out,” Grumbles said. “This is not a quick note dashed off to a friend.”

Then there are these gems collected by Grumbles and her colleagues:

• “There is nothing wrong with my writing, maybe it is her that doesn’t know what she is doing,” one student wrote.

• “After writing numerous papers I feel I have improved existentially,” another student wrote.

• One student meant to say “ludicrous,” but instead wrote “Ludacris,” the rapper.

• And in another paper: “He should not have taken that for granite.”

ACCEPT THE ERRORS?
A university lecturer in England says teachers should accept their students’ errors — Febuary instead of February or speach instead of speech. “Either we go on beating ourselves and our students up over this problem, or we simply give everyone a break,” Ken Smith wrote last month in the Times Higher Education Supplement.

Grumbles isn’t willing to cut her students that much slack. “Certain standards need to stay in place,” she said. But even Brockenbrough admits that there are times when bad grammar or spelling is a good thing. The song “(I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction” sounds a lot better than “I Cannot Receive Any Satisfaction,” she said.

Grammar: Does it matter or don't it With which viewpoint in this article do you find yourself agreeing?

Ultimately, to what extent should we care about standard grammar and spelling? How important is it? Is it better to maintain the rules we have, or should we let them go, as long as people understand one another? Post your response.

In your posting, please make sure to respond to the most intriguing argument put forward by one of your peers.

Also, just for the sake of argument, you must use proper grammar. Any response that doesn't will only earn half-credit.



Sunday, February 1, 2009

Grammar Matters? IB ENGLISH 1st and 2nd periods

This article was submitted by Stephanie Hernandez (and now she gets serious extra credit).

Read the following article about grammar. Then respond to my questions to you, which you'll find at the end of the article. You'll have to read the article first, though.

DALLAS -- A cup of regualar coffee sounds like the perfect way to start your day. Wouldn’t some cheep gas be nice? But if you park your car, you’ve been warned: No in-and-out priviliges. These mangled spellings — on real-life signs around the Dallas-Fort Worth area — underline the obvious: Spelling isn’t always high on our list. And our grammar ain’t that good, to.

It’s enough to make your English teacher cringe — and drive others to break the law. Last month, two men were sentenced to probation and banned from national parks for a year after getting busted for fixing errors on a sign in Grand Canyon National Park. The men travel the country correcting signs as part of the Typo Eradication Advancement League. And, yeah, they might have crossed the line by messing with a historical sign in a national park, but they’ve got a point.

Across the country, our land is littered with signs, posters, ads, menus — you name it — that are riddled with spelling and grammatical errors. In some cases, human spell-checkers battle these boo-boos by fixing the errors on their own. Others snap pictures and trash the typos on their blogs.

GRAMMAR ON A DOWNWARD SPIRAL?
Grammarians say these are bad signs of the times — our language is on a downward spiral. Correct spelling and proper grammar matter and help us understand each other, said Martha Brockenbrough, who founded the Society for the Promotion of Good Grammar. “There are rules for how you play football and there are rules for how you drive,” she said. “Standards of football keep things interesting, fair and fun. I think they do the same for language.”

Sign offenders abound around Dallas-Fort Worth. Hungry and in a hurry? A fast-food restaurant sign showcased a deal for "10 pieses of chicken." A Knox-Henderson restaurant is “Now Open for LUNCH FRIDAY’S” (drop the apostrophe, guys). Want a bargain? You can get it at the Bargin City Bazaar in Oak Cliff. How about this twisted apology at a toy store: “We apologise for the inconveinance.” A mural on the side of a building at the Preston Royal shopping center shows what appears to be a movie theater with a sign that says: “ Premier Tonight.”

Misspelled words and names slip into newspapers and television news graphics every day. An Associated Press story described Joe Lieberman as the 2000 Democratic vice presidential ... well, let’s just say that it was quickly changed to “pick.”

Different groups have different ways of handling the more permanent typos and misspellings, without breaking the law. Brockenbrough’s Society for the Promotion of Good Grammar takes the polite route, sending out friendly letters to offenders encouraging them to make corrections. “It’s not about shame and humiliation,” said Brockenbrough of Seattle, who launched National Grammar Day this year.

TEXTING CONTRIBUTES TO DOWNFALL OF GRAMMAR?
Some also say that students’ text messaging and Twittering — which encourage short notes and abbreviations and spelling-be-damned — are seeping into formal writing. Students are writing informally now more than ever, said Diana Grumbles, director of the First-Year Writing Program at Southern Methodist University. Some of her students don’t capitalize or use punctuation when they send her a quick e-mail. Some will submit in-class writing assignments with symbols. “I always just circle these things and tell them at the end of the paper that they have to write the words out,” Grumbles said. “This is not a quick note dashed off to a friend.”

Then there are these gems collected by Grumbles and her colleagues:

• “There is nothing wrong with my writing, maybe it is her that doesn’t know what she is doing,” one student wrote.

• “After writing numerous papers I feel I have improved existentially,” another student wrote.

• One student meant to say “ludicrous,” but instead wrote “Ludacris,” the rapper.

• And in another paper: “He should not have taken that for granite.”

ACCEPT THE ERRORS?
A university lecturer in England says teachers should accept their students’ errors — Febuary instead of February or speach instead of speech. “Either we go on beating ourselves and our students up over this problem, or we simply give everyone a break,” Ken Smith wrote last month in the Times Higher Education Supplement.

Grumbles isn’t willing to cut her students that much slack. “Certain standards need to stay in place,” she said. But even Brockenbrough admits that there are times when bad grammar or spelling is a good thing. The song “(I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction” sounds a lot better than “I Cannot Receive Any Satisfaction,” she said.

Grammar: Does it matter or don't it With which viewpoint in this article do you find yourself agreeing?

Ultimately, to what extent should we care about standard grammar and spelling? How important is it? Is it better to maintain the rules we have, or should we let them go, as long as people understand one another? Post your response.

In your posting, please make sure to respond to the most intriguing argument put forward by one of your peers.

Also, just for the sake of argument, you must use proper grammar. Any response that doesn't will only earn half-credit.



Tuesday, January 20, 2009

IB ENGLISH 1st PERIOD

Choose a critical lens that interests you. You may choose the lens that you looked through in class, or you may choose any other from the critical theory packet.

Please respond to the following questions and agree or disagree with ONE other BLOGGER:

1. Identify the lens through which you are viewing this text.
2. Based on your reading of the text, WHY is Meursault the way he is? Use at least one key piece of evidence to support your interpretation.
3. Through your lens, why does this text matter in the world?

Due Thursday, Jan. 22, before class.

IB ENGLISH 2nd PERIOD

Choose a critical lens that interests you. You may choose the lens that you looked through in class, or you may choose any other from the critical theory packet.

Please respond to the following questions and agree or disagree with ONE other BLOGGER:

1. Identify the lens through which you are viewing this text.
2. Based on your reading of the text, WHY did Meursault do what he did? Why did he shoot "the Arab," first once, and then four more times? Use at least one key piece of evidence to support your interpretation.
3. Through your lens, why does this text matter in the world?

Due Thursday, Jan. 22, before class.

AP ENGLISH THIRD PERIOD BLOG

Choose a critical lens that interests you. You may choose the lens that you looked through in class, or you may choose any other from the critical theory packet.

Please respond to the following questions and agree or disagree with ONE other BLOGGER:

1. Identify the lens through which you are viewing this text.
2. Based on your reading of the text, WHY is Meursault the way he is? Use one key piece of evidence to support your interpretation.
3. Through your lens, why does this text matter in the world?

Due Thursday, Jan. 22, before class.

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

AP ENGLISH PERIOD 3: Murakami's Portrayals of Men and Women

Some say that anyone who cares about the portrayal of women should be wary of Haruki Murakami's work, because women in his world are portrayed almost uniformly negatively.
Other critics argue that in actuality, the men in Murakami's world are the losers in the portrayal game. They say that the men are characterized negatively throughout.

What do you say? In this blog, you must refer to at least two stories, and you must respond to the comments of at least one fellow student.

Here are two comments from a blog on Murakami to start you off:

I don't know if murakami's work can exactly be described as "misogynist", maybe it's just that he's not very good at writing women, but his female characters tend to be drawn from a male ideal of a certain type of woman/girl rather than existing in their own right.

Well,I agree with the opinion that Murakami's novels are weak on drawing female characters, because the first person is usually "僕boku"(means male"I"), but I think it's the men who end up looking unsympathetic.